You get what you pay for
May 3rd, 2011I’ve been meaning to write a post about some hot issues that have occurred here in the past couple of months.
First of all, just recently, GEPIK (Gyeonggi-do English Program in Korea, responsible for hiring native English teachers (NETs) for the area surrounding Seoul) announced that their upcoming orientation for new NETs would have a ban on alcohol. According to the thread over at Waygook.org1:
-RatnaMH
“In the end there was one NET who went back to his room and ended up in a fistfight with his roommate, several who were late or didn’t even bother to show up to the meeting on the following day”
-derbear86
“One girl got so drunk, came back to the dorm and fell down the stairs. She broke her leg and had to meet her co-teacher and go to her new school the next day.”
-gifappeltjie
“some people thought, during an already noisy party on the 1st night … that it would be amusing to set off the fire extinguishers inside the hotel room. Seconds later, an entire room was covered in several inches of white foam.”
-richarquis
Though these instances are in the minority, they’re significant enough that it’s totally understandable that GEPIK would want to ban alcohol as a result of the NETs behaviour. I’d suggest that rather than banning alcohol, simply firing these types of people on the spot would immediately eliminate these types of people from ever stepping foot into a classroom.
Secondly, a couple of months ago the deaths of two native English teachers occurred. The first was an apparent suicide by a 31-year-old American, identified by the media as K, who jumped out of his 14th storey window wearing no clothes from the waist down. It was assumed that K was an alcoholic due to the empty soju bottles in his apartment, being caught on CCTV in the elevator drinking soju, and the fact that he caused a scene while inebriated at Gimhae airport the day prior.
The English media in Korea was sympathetic. From ATEK:
The Korean media took a different stance.
So rather than expressing sympathy, the author chose to attack native teachers in general. Further down in the article the qualifications of native teachers are questioned and more stringent checks of qualifications and health are suggested.
The second death occurred shortly afterwards. A Canadian English teacher, identified as A, passed out on train tracks around 5:50am and was killed by a train. Though it’s unknown whether he was an alcoholic, police believe he was highly intoxicated that particular night.
The Korean media jumped on this with zero sympathy. Instead, criticism of the NET hiring process:
(my translation, forgive me for not getting the exact meaning)
So, we have some examples of “NETs behaving badly.” And the Korean media mentioning that there should be more strict criteria and requirements for the hiring of native English teachers. Let’s have a look at the current government-mandated criteria.
1. A native speaker from Canada, U.S.A, U.K., Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa
2. Four-year university degree
3. National criminal background check
4. Health check (for HIV and drug usage, including marijuana)
5. Consular interview
So basically, one just need to be a native speaker of English who graduated from university and is not a criminal or drug user. Optionally, if one has a degree in English, a TEFL/TESOL or CELTA/DELTA certificate, or is a licensed teacher in their home country, their pay level goes up.
Presumably, experienced teachers wouldn’t show up to orientation and drink their faces off. People with certifications tend to take their jobs more seriously since, for them, it’s a career rather than just a one-year working vacation. So why not require certifications at the minimum for NETs?
Sigh…
It would appear that, despite Koreans wanting higher-quality native English teachers, they’re doing the exact opposite. GEPIK (the same education office that is banning alcohol at their orientation) has recently decided not to renew the contracts of various NETs due to budgetary concerns. From a thread on Waygook.org:
-pez5
As Brian Deutsch points out, SMOE, GEPIK, and EPIK all require teachers to be a maximum of 55 years old6. Something tells me that teachers in this age range would be unlikely to engage is binge drinking.
Furthermore, according to user “bern” on the original thread:
So, doesn’t it make sense to increase the entrance requirements to avoid undesirable people coming in and causing a ruckus? And rather than hiring fresh-faced university graduates who have a tendency to go wild, hire those who are more experienced and less likely to cause trouble.
Korea can’t have both low salaries and highly qualified teachers.
Sources
1 “Alcohol banned at GEPIK orientation”
2 “Message From ATEK On Recent Busan English Teacher Suicide”
3 “One can only be aghast” that a suicidal drunk was teaching children”
4 “어느 원어민 강사의 죽음” (“One Native English Teacher’s Death”)
6 “No room for older, experienced teachers at public schools”
















